Is that the title the sandbelt clubs were after?
i have heard that the land is covered by 3 titles and 1 maybe 2 of these have been sold. the one that has been sold has the pump shed on it which could make things interesting down the track.
St Andrews Beach
Posted 02 July 2009 - 04:37 AM
Posted 03 July 2009 - 07:46 PM
Posted 15 July 2009 - 05:16 AM
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:50 AM
Posted 16 July 2009 - 06:28 AM
Golfguru, Can you tell us what is Claytons work & what is not at Victoria? I assume you know that much of the recent work is not his. Please list the new work done at Victoria GC over the last few years & who designed it.
Let’s just say it’s not what it used to be. Clayton has made a real mess of it. Members are not happy and they’ve got every reason to be p…... off.
The condtion has been an issue for some time. I know a lot of members who are seriously considering their fees and looking at other clubs.
Posted 16 July 2009 - 09:37 AM
Posted 16 July 2009 - 08:22 PM
Posted 17 July 2009 - 07:59 AM
Posted 17 July 2009 - 04:16 PM
Posted 24 July 2009 - 09:17 AM
Posted 24 July 2009 - 05:41 PM
So what you are saying is, you don't know what is Clayton's work at Victoria & what is not. If you can name exactly what work Clayton has done at Victoria & what is wrong with it, then fine; but you don't seem to be able to, so stop slandering someone's name without any facts.
Mac asking for both, being able to back-up his accusations and getting the facts right is obviously beyond him.
Talk about slinging mud around.
Posted 25 July 2009 - 05:25 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users