© 2000-2007 iseekgolf.com. All Rights Reserved. ABN: 89 096 508 495
Recent Posts by thieftaker
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 17
|
2 hours ago
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Tee Markers
See AAA’s post above re the definition of teeing ground: ......the front and sides of which are defined by the outside limits of the two tee markers…... So it is quite ok to tee up behind the tee marker as it would be within the teeing round (but give yourself plenty of room to clear it!). |
|
Nov 28, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Plugged ball lip of buker - Oz Masters
All of his unplayable options leave him in the bunker. |
|
Nov 28, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Plugged ball lip of buker - Oz Masters HCWT – The bunker extends vertically downwards only (see Def). The issue is, is it an earthen wall, therefore part of the bunker and therefore no relief. OR is it a stacked turf face and therefore not part of the bunker and therefore relief for embedded ball TtG (Australasian hard card gives relief TtG for an embedded ball). – see the Def of “bunker”. |
|
Nov 22, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Out of Bounds (again) As the ball was OOB you must proceed under stroke and distance ie return to the tee (27-1). |
|
Nov 13, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Casual Water That is the beauty and the difficulty of a worldwide game played on differing topography in different climatic regions. But the definitions apply to planet Earth, Committees have a responsibility to mark the course, if they miss something I’m sure they’ve done their best. I wonder during these torrential downpours if the course is considered playable in any case? |
|
Nov 10, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / 2 clublengths Yes, I think he is ok. I cannot see anything to say different. Look elsewhere for greater wisdom.;) |
|
Nov 10, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / 2 clublengths He hasn’t used a club to measure. His drop was within the distance of his putter. |
|
Nov 4, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Tempers Rising :-[
I would have thought that the effect of the Decision is a matter of degree and whether the area of intended swing has “in fact” been improved. To suggest that the effect of the decision relates to “major infringement – branches” is misleading, when the decision speaks of a leaf or leaves D.13-2/22 Knocking Down Leaves with a Practice Swing. The breach does not have to be “major” it just has to be enough to make the “improvement”. |
|
Nov 4, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Drop rules, GUR beside fairway bunker. Through the green, determine NPoR and drop, without penalty, within 1 club length of that spot, ball not to be dropped in a hazard (eg bunker) or on a putting green (r.25-1b(i)). If that means fairway, so be it. |
|
Nov 3, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / fringe ruling
You are entitled to the lie and line that your shot gives you. So if your shot results in your ball causing a pitch (or ball) mark on your line off the green then that is what you have to deal with. |
|
Oct 27, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Wrong hole in one!!!
If the greens were joined and the player holed out in the wrong hole, then relief is taken under the GUR provisions as the hole is a “hole made by a greenkeeper” and Rule 25-1 is applicable – see Decision 16/7. See also Dec 25-3/1 for a possible variation where a joined green is separated by the Committee.. |
|
Oct 26, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Wrong hole in one!!! I am assuming that the greens are separate, not shared, if so wrong putting green proceed under 25-3. |
|
Oct 24, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Ball moved of its own accord
I suspect that this is the incident of which you speak, Cabrera at Wentworth. Maybe harsh, but don’t mess with a ball in a precarious lie. |
|
Oct 17, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / tournament win Anyone in an open comp is fair game, regardless of their age. Letting people win is not in the spirit of the game, if it didn’t kill the young guy it made him stronger. Shame the father wasn’t on site, probably would have made the whole affair a lot more colourful, then again, maybe it was better for the winner (and everyone else) that he wasn’t. |
|
Oct 16, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Miles Not obligatory, but wise to measure. (I’ve never seen anyone name a thread after themselves – very innovative;)) |
|
Oct 13, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / waiving rule It is not quite right to say there can be no penalty for turning a blind eye to another players infringement, doesn’t matter if you are marking their card or not: Decision 33-7/9 The responsibility for knowing the Rules lies with all players. In stroke play, the player and his marker have an explicit responsibility for the correctness of the player’s score card. There may, however, be exceptional individual cases where, in order to protect the interests of every other player in the competition, it would be reasonable to expect a fellow-competitor or another competitor to bring to light a player’s breach of the Rules by notifying the player, his marker or the Committee. In such exceptional circumstances, it would be appropriate for the Committee to impose a penalty of disqualification under Rule 33-7 on a fellow-competitor or another competitor if it becomes apparent that he has failed to advise the player, his marker or the Committee of a Rules breach with the clear intention of allowing that player to return an incorrect score. (New) |
|
Sep 26, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / conceding hole in match play Time to pull the pin guys. |
|
Sep 22, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Buggy rolling into a bunker?? No penalty for deliberately placing your clubs in a hazard either (13-4 Ex.1b). |
|
Sep 8, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Match Play - Stepping opponents ball If you stepped on your opponent’s ball, other than during a search for it, the penalty is one stroke and the ball must be replaced (r.18-3). If the lie is altered then the opponent must place the ball in the nearest lie most similar to the original lie, or in a bunker the lie must be re-created.(R20-3b) |
|
Aug 28, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Match play Jon, |
|
Aug 18, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / moving rake in bunker Start a new thread. |
|
Aug 18, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Water Hazard Your options are dictated by the LR in place for the hole. I have never played the course but from the website I note that the hole is almost all water carry. I also note the presence of a yellow stake in the photo of the hole, making the hazard a water hazard (unless there are some red stakes further on out of picture). I can only guess that the LR may have been struck due to difficulties in taking a drop not nearer the hole, or taking WH relief, it is open for the Committee to instigate a drop zone as an additional option for water hazard relief. |
|
Aug 11, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Artificial Device If it is there for the purpose of gauging or measuring distance or conditions that might affect the play of the player, then IMO, it would be a breach. A “lucky charm”? You don’t see to many dream catchers out on the course.;) |
|
Aug 11, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Fellow competitor identifies ball It is a bad practice and should not happen, BUT, in stroke play there is no penalty – R.18-4. |
|
Aug 11, 2008
|
Topic: Rules of Golf / Concession of stroke - match play Dec. 2-4/6 Putting Out After Concession of Stroke. That sums it all up. |