QUOTE: ted.arlt.02 @ Feb 4 2005, 06:58 PM
Henry pointed out something to that effect. Even assuming the changes didn't take place - is Commonwealth worthy of an '8'?
Maybe if Doak had it to do all over again he might revise some of the copy describing each rating. Maybe not.
I understand what Tom was thinking when he said that Commonwealth was startegically pure. So many holes have such great simple strategy (2, 9, 14, 16, and 17 being the best examples). There are more interesting holes on that course than any other course on the sandbelt except RM.
Tell me what you'd be missing if you skipped 1 West?
Only the best collection of slalom mounds on the sandbelt!