Loading ...
Question for hackPro (locked)
Forums → Golf Instruction | 184 posts
|
To get a different and propoer perspective on swing plane and point of impact on ball flight golfers should go onto You tube and look at clip called strangest swings in all of golf. Sorry not a techo so cannot give a link. Good players on here go and look at these swings, none of which would meet modern coaching teaching standards and the discussion we are having here . One cannot help feel that had these players been coached by some of the modern swing theory purist coaches with all this high tech monitors telling them about ball spin and D planes and ground forces etc that these players might still be of 18 hcaps. Instead these good world class players have done what was suggested earlier and developed own feel of where and how to put the club head on the ball to give desired shot shape After looking at this clip come back on here and tell me all about theoretical swing planes at 45 degree to face angle and and open or closed stances and how this influences ball flight.
VTPP 0482 OOM winner Patterson River 2010 A grade winner Sunshine OOM#4 2012 Winning team in Beaconhills Invitational Classic 2012 2012 Rotary Ambrose Champions “All Star Team” Member. |
|
I agree with your assumption there, Weety. I had one today where I needed to fade a shot around a bend. I aimed a bit left and opened the face a little. When I played the shot, it started further left and came back to where I had aimed. Not what i wanted. It seems my subconscious compensated for my adjustment. I probably fall into the ‘tinkerer’ category. I need to know why something is done or I seem to lack commitment to doing it. And if something is not working right, I want to know why, not just ‘the fix’. I need to know why the fix actually fixes the problem. That’s not to say that I can translate technical knowledge into a physically better swing.
|
|
CB, as you know, most of the world class golfers learnt to play as kids by hitting thousands of balls. Once they learnt to hit them long and straight, they then played around with shaping shots. Their swings may have been technically imperfect, but they made them work with superb consistency. For example, Moe Norman. Austistic, failed at school, shunned by other kids, spent all his time hitting golf balls. He became an absolute master at that.
|
|
I think some players from the past would have embraced technology (if it were available) and become better players due to a greater understanding of cause and effect. Some would have beat balls and worked things out using that method. Pretty much the same as today.
There are two types of people in this world. Those that can extrapolate from incomplete data…. |
|
Me too. It turns out I’m surprisingly good at following direction with a swing and it it a problem when you get instruction that is feel based or based on errors. I did the set up where you want it to start and face where you want it to finish. And the ball would start where I wanted it to finish and then keep going away from that. I could override the compensations and it didn’t go well! Similar with swinging to right field. I did that. And got very good at hitting big pushes! Feel over real isn’t a good swing building plan for me! :-)
http://www.golflink.com.au/... |
|
We’ll let him take the credit. It would be difficult to believe that I had started a topic in the “hottest” list.
Taking lack of talent to a whole new level. |
|
+1 To right 2putts. I can’t believe the wrong misconceptions people have about technology. CB80, With all these guys we never tried to change their swings just improve their movements patterns or kinetic link. How by FEELS, they did drills which made them duplicate the right coordination and better movement patterns we wanted to achieve. From doing these drills they developed “feelings” they could take these feelings to the practice fairway and integrate these feelings into their swing. Go tell these guys CB80 technology doesn’t help and see their reaction :) What a great idea standing on the practice fairway for hours on end, grinding balls and slicing the hell out of the ball. Then stand there like an imbecile trying to figure out why the ball slices or why did that hook and wasting endless hours and may never improve. Not sure about anyone else, life is too short to be wasting time on a practice fairway grinding thousands ball to try and figure out my ball flights laws. When I can get on a trackman within half an hour know how and why. Then I can utilise my time on the practice fairway knowing what is going on, if I slice i know why, hook I know why. I can then learn to control and replicate theses shots to take them onto the course. Oh yeah and develop feels I need to hit each shot. With technology you can actually teach people how to develop feelings to swing the club better or shape the ball etc.
http://www.facebook.com/zen... Core Health first 3D gym in the world. 1 Golf Links Road, Frankston South |
|
The forgotten hero!
http://www.golflink.com.au/... |
|
Thank you, i really appreciate this explanation. I will be on prac fairway practicing 100s of cuts and hooks now to get the feel, what a clever solution to fixing swing path problems! Cheers
|
|
that actually makes sense, and doing that works, trouble is don’t work on anything but a flat lie…..
http://www.golflink.com.au/... it is what it is……. |
|
and that is the hardest part of golf, most courses are not flat, and even throughout, so you need to adjust for nearly every shot not off the tee, so my query is, how do you know where to move your feet, for each different lie? I usually figure it out on the shot after the duff, or skull, and then forget 5 holes later and do it again, costs me 5-10 shots a game….... What is the method for setting up correctly for on the various lies on a fairway? Ball above your feet? Thanks Hack for your prompt response….
http://www.golflink.com.au/... it is what it is……. |
|
old bogey you hit the right shape
any one else heading home to get married?? |
|
I find it funny that people expect that because you have the face pointing somewhere at address it will be there at impact. A lot can happen in a back swing.
What is this golf game you talk of? |
|
I have a guy who was on 17 handicap for 15 years, grind balls tried his heart out never improved. He did biomechanics for 2 years did drills to train his body how the move better. The feels he developed from his drills, he integrated these feels into his swing now he’s on 1 handicap. OMG!! you mean there are more of these stories….
any one else heading home to get married?? |
|
true stink Now stink has seen my draw and fade work,
any one else heading home to get married?? |
|
Interesting. I can, and do, do this when i need to hit a strong draw or a hook.
2012 B Grade Champ Paterson River ISG OOM Round #3 |
|
Hack, How much wood would a woodchuck chuck Thanks in advance, Orbs
In Smoldy we trust. |
|
What is the method for setting up correctly for on the various lies on a fairway? mick
any one else heading home to get married?? |
|
Rob
any one else heading home to get married?? |
|
2 cubic metres
any one else heading home to get married?? |
|
That’s a lot of ground forces for a squirrel.
In Smoldy we trust. |
|
Dont deloft anymore, but thanks got those pearls champ…..
http://www.golflink.com.au/... it is what it is……. |
|
about time
any one else heading home to get married?? |
|
Kiwi, blatantly obvious that my alignments at impact were not as I intended. But thanks for your input. Agree with Stinks. Except if alignment is ‘out’ at setup, there is a strong chance that it won’t be right at impact.
|
|
you obviously haven gone through the who’s who of zeno link
any one else heading home to get married?? |
Forums → Golf Instruction
Loading ...