© 2000-2007 iseekgolf.com. All Rights Reserved. ABN: 89 096 508 495
testing a bunker
Forums → Rules of Golf | 5 posts
|
My son was recently penalised 2 strokes under rule 13-4 for testing the surface of a bunker by pressing the sand in a remote corner with the toe of his shoe, not effecting in any way the lie of his ball. The rules specify hand or club. Was he correctly penalised?
|
|
Have a look at Decision 13-4/0.5 Meaning of “Test the Condition of the Hazard†in Rule 13-4a (I have bolded the relevant bits) Q. What is meant by “test the condition of the hazard†in Rule 13-4a? A. The term covers all actions by which the player could gain more information about the hazard than could be gained from taking his stance for the stroke to be made, bearing in mind that a certain amount of digging in with the feet in the sand or soil is permitted when taking the stance for a stroke. Examples of actions that would not constitute testing the condition of the hazard include the following:
Examples of actions that would constitute testing the condition of the hazard in breach of Rule 13-4a include the following:
Trentham Golf Club |
|
I posted this in another thread but it probably belongs here . Had a look yesterday at a scorecard from a club in W.A. On the back in the local rules was this gem.
A bad day on the golf course is better than no golf at all.
:( |
|
pom – public golf course, no rakes speeds up play as you’re not waiting for people to rake the bunkers when they’ve had their shots. They put rakes back in if they have pro-ams or similar. Brett
|
|
Rather thought that must be the case. Just struck me as amusing when a mate showed me the card.
A bad day on the golf course is better than no golf at all.
:( |