© 2000-2007 iseekgolf.com. All Rights Reserved. ABN: 89 096 508 495
A Rank Decision
Forums → Golf Talk | 4 posts
|
Discussion for A Rank Decision
|
|
I have always compared golf courses to paintings. Some you like some you don’t. A couse architect has the ground he is given as his canvas. His vision turns ground into a piece of art we all love to play on. Some get better a better canvas than others. Some use bulldozers and machinery to improve their canvas. Some get given a brilliant canvas. eg a blind man could have turned the canvas that became Barnbougle Dunes into a fantastic course It seems to me in the ratings that new is better to a large degree. ie you would expect them to be better conditioned but most of them have a sameness about them and therefore lack memorability and character. A good example is Pacific Harbour. Nice course I have played 3 times on holidays. (has improved each time) Water, big slopy greens and room for lots of houses. Is it a golf course or a housing development with a course in it. Thats what makes Barnbougle pure – no housing development there. New = way overated resort, pay for play and housing development courses in order of rating I have played are - Moonah Links (open course) – Thompson can talk it up all he likes but it is till just a boring slog Hope Island – as per above re Thomo (note it is going backwards in the ratings continually) Sanctuary Cove (Pines) – Arnies influence was to build a long course with the highest ACR in Australia – that was all he achieved aside from making an impossibly hard course for rich fat incompetent resort guests Coolum – only where it is because it hosts the PGA – boring layout that can only get worse when all the new condos are built The Vines – ditto Coolum for hosting major tournaments – facilities also a bit run down Club Pelican – another Pacific Harbour with the Shark influence Links Lady Bay – Jack Newton uses a bulldozer to create a links – you are joking Pacific Dunes – refer to Club Pelican Pacific Harbour – see previous comments Twin Waters – older version of Pacific Harbour – going backwards now Jack doesn’t hold his end of season hit and giggle there Horizons – as per Twin Waters Noosa Springs – best thing about that track are the mansions in it – more marble than the Taj Mahal Murray Downs – rated 89 but at least as good as all of the above My thoughts, hope this gets some lively conversation going. Your thoughts?
Drive for show, Putt for dough, Shank for comic relief. |
|
I prefer to play members tracks over the resorts, hugely wide fairways and even bigger greens… They are not a ball striking contest as you can hit it anywhere and have a shot at a flag, even if it is cut tight behing a trap.. A decent members track will always test the better players more.. And they can’t be tricked up like the resorts either, that is a pet hate of mine..
|
|
Completely agree Brendan, Bribie Isalnd is a better track than Pacific Harbour. It used to host PGA Q school so somebody thought it was ok.
Drive for show, Putt for dough, Shank for comic relief. |